Compare

Cyclotella comensis has valves that are tangentially undulate, with secondary radial undulation.
Cyclotella tripartita
similarly has ornamentation in three wedge-shaped groups, but its valve face is radially undulate.
Cyclotella kuetzingiana
and C. krammeri have much smaller central areas, with irregular, occasionally bifurcating striae giving the central area perimeter a 'ragged' appearance.
Cyclotella ocellata may be difficult to distinguish. In general, C. ocellata shows 3 (sometimes 4-6) deep, concentric depressions and may have 3 large papillae or silica ‘balls’ on the valve face.

LM scalebar = 10 µm
Fallen Leaf Lake Ca Sed25 30  Crossii9 Fallen Leaf Lake Ca Sed25 30  Crossii1 Fallen Leaf Lake Ca Sed25 30  Crossii4 Fallen Leaf Lake Ca Sed25 30  Crossii8 Fallen Leaf Lake Ca Sed25 30  Crossii2 Fallen Leaf Lake Ca Sed25 30  Crossii10 Fallen Leaf Lake Ca Sed25 30  Crossii6
Diameter
6.3-16.5 µm
Striae in 10 µm
20-22

Lindavia comensis

(Grunow) Nakov, Guillory, M.L.Julius, E.C.Ther. and A.J.Alverson 2015

Lindavia comensis LM1 Lindavia comensis LM2 Lindavia comensis LM3 Lindavia comensis LM3 Lindavia comensis LM5 Lindavia comensis LM6 Lindavia comensis LM7
Diameter
5-12 µm
Width Range
1.5-3.0 µm
Striae in 10 µm
9-12 based on circumferential density

Lindavia ocellata

(Pant.) Nakov et al. 2015

Cyocell 1A Cyocell 2 Lyocellata 1 Cyocell 3 Cyocell 4 Lioccel 210 7 Lioccel 112 3 7
Diameter
3.7-15 µm
Striae in 10 µm
15-30 based on circumferential density

Also compare to

Lindavia tripartita

(Håk.) Nakov et al.

BioData Reference
Houk et al. 2010 Pl 210 Figs 1-25

Cyclotella keutzingiana

Thwaites

Cyclotella krammeri

Håkansson